• Lytvynenko Oleksandr
Keywords: historical memory, historical narrative, national identity.


The article is devoted to the problems of historical memory formation as a factor of national identity formation. Its actuality is due to the serious challenges that exist in Ukraine for the Ukrainian national identity. These challenges are due to the long-term impossibility of developing our own historical discourse, regionalization of historical memories, politicization of historical issues. The comparative and structural-functional methods have mainly been used in this research. The first one is a comparative analysis of different interpretations of historical memory and national identity. The second has been used in determining the structure of historical memory and the directions of its influence on the formation of national identity. Historical memory became the object of the author's scientific interests in 2015. A more detailed study of the impact of historical memory on national identity was carried out in 2020.
The article analyzes the phenomena of national identity and historical memory, the structure and functions of historical memory, its connection with history as a science have been analyzed in this article. The most significant and relevant, according to the author, problems of formation of historical memory in modern Ukraine have also been covered: 1) time gaps and deformations of this process; 2) the long impossibility, in fact, until the end of the twentieth century, of actualization in the public consciousness of one's own historical narrative; 3) significant regional differences in historical memories that lead to horizontal gaps in historical memory; 4) mental alienation of Ukrainians from a significant part of their history.
The discussion examines the critique ideas of essentialist about the nation and national identity, based on the concept of the nation as an "imagined community", reveals its theoretical shortcomings and political motivation. Arguments were also made against the call of some Ukrainian historians to abandon the national paradigm of historiography as one that allegedly leads to "provincialism" and "isolationism."
The importance of historical policy or the policy of memory for post-socialist countries, the urgency of the problems of historical memory for Western countries in the context of globalization and migration challenges have been emphasized in the conclusion.


Assman, A. (2012). Prostory spohadu. Formy ta transformatsii kulturnoi pamiati. [Memory spaces. Forms and transformations of cultural memory.]. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr. (in Ukrainian)
Anderson, Benedykt. (2001). Uiavleni spilnoty. Mirkuvannia shchodo pokhodzhennia y poshyrennia natsionalizmu. [Imaginary communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism.]. Kyiv: Krytyka, 2001. (in Ukrainian)
Babka, V. (2016). Istorychna pamiat yak faktor politychnoho vplyvu v nezalezhnii Ukraini. [Historical memory as a factor of political influence in independent Ukraine.]. (Dys. kand. polit. nauk.). Nizhynskyi derzhavnyi universytet imeni Mykoly Hoholia, Nizhyn. (in Ukrainian)
Bechtel, Delphine. (2013). The 1941 Pogroms as Represented in Western Ukrainian Historiography and Memorial Culture. The Holocaust in Ukraine: New Sources and Perspectives Conference Presentations. Center for advanced Holocaust studies. United States Holocaust memorial museum.
Bystritsky, E., Proleev S., White O., Loznitsa S., Zymovets R., Kobets R. (2015). Natsionalna identychnist i hromadianske suspilstvo. [National identity and civil society.]. Kyiv: Spirit and Letter. (in Ukrainian)
Greenfeld, Leah. (2012). Natsyonalyzm. Piat putei k sovremennosty. [Nationalism. Five ways to the present.]. Moscow: PER SE. (in Russian)
Hobsbawm, E., Ranger T. (Eds.). (2010). Vynaidennia tradytsii. [Invention of tradition.]. Kiev: Nika-Center. (in Ukrainian)
Hrytsak, Ya. (2010, December 2). Novi povoroty v ukrainskii politytsi pamiati. [New turns in the Ukrainian politics of memory.]. Zakhid.net. Retrieved from: https://zaxid.net/novi_povoroti_v_ukrayinskiy_polititsi_pamyati_n111751
Kasianov, H., Tolochko, O. (2012). Natsionalni istorii ta suchasna istoriohrafiia: vyklyky ta nebezpeky pry napysanni novoi istorii Ukrainy. [National histories and modern historiography: challenges and dangers in writing a new history of Ukraine.]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal. 6, 4–24. (in Ukrainian)
Khantynhton, Samiuэl. (2018). Kto mы? Vыzovы amerykanskoi natsyonalnoi ydentychnosty. [Who are we? Challenges of American national identity.]. Moskva: AST. (in Russian)
Kohut, Zenon. (2004). Korinnia identychnosti. Studii z Ukrainy. [The roots of identity. Studies in early modern and modern history of Ukraine.]. Kyiv: Krytyka. (in Ukrainian)
Kozellek, Rainhart. (2005). Mynule maibutnie. Pro semantyku istorychnoho chasu. [Past future. On the semantics of historical time.]. Kyiv: Dukh i litera. (in Ukrainian)
Krymskyi, S. B. (2008). Pid syhnaturoiu Sofii. [Under the signature of Sophia.]. Kyiv: Vyd. dim «Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia». (in Ukrainian)
Nahorna, L.P. (2012). Istorychna pamiat: teorii, dyskursy, refleksii. [Historical memory: theories, discourses, reflections.]. Kyiv: IPiEND im. I.F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy. (in Ukrainian)
Nora, Pier. (2014). Teperishnie, natsiia, pamiat. [The present, the nation, the memory.]. Kyiv: TOV «Vydavnytstvo «Klio». (in Ukrainian)
Plokhii, S. (2013). Yakoi istorii potrebuie suchasna Ukraina? [What kind of history does modern Ukraine need?]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal. 3, 4-12.(in Ukrainian)
Renan, Ernest. (2000). Shcho take natsiia? [What is a nation?]. O. Protsenko, B. Lisovyi (uporiad.) «Natsionalizm» (Antolohiia). (s. 107-120). Kyiv: «Smoloskyp» (in Ukrainian)
Riuzen, Yorn. (2010). Novi shliakhy istorychnoho myslennia. [New ways of historical thinking.]. Lviv: Litopys (in Ukrainian).
Rozumnyi, Maksym. (2006). Ideia i natsiia v informatsiinu epokhu: monohrafiia. [The idea and the nation in the information age: a monograph.]. Kharkiv: Maidan. (in Ukrainian)
Rykёr, P. (2004). Pamiat, ystoryia, zabvenye. [Memory, history, oblivion.]. Moskva: Yzdatelstvo humanytarnoi lyteratur. (in Russian)
Smit, Entoni D. (2009). Kulturni osnovy natsii. Iierarkhiia, zapovit i respublika. [Cultural foundations of nations. Hierarchy, testament and republic.]. Kyiv: Tempora. (in Ukrainian)
Stepyko, M. T. (2020). Ukrainska identychnist u hlobalizovanomu sviti. [Ukrainian identity in a globalized world.]. Kharkiv: Maidan. (in Ukrainian)
Yakovenko, Natalia. (2012). Dzerkala identychnosti. Doslidzhennia z istorii uiavlen ta idei v Ukraini XVI –pochatku XVIII stolittia. [Mirrorsof identity. Research on the historyof ideas in Ukraine in the XVI - earlyXVIII centuries.]. Kyiv: Laurus. (inUkrainian)
Zaitsev, O. (2015, liutyi 26). Viina i vidpovidalnist istorykiv. [War and the responsibility of historians.]. Lviv: Ukrainskyi katolytskyi universytet. Retrieved from: https://ucu.edu.ua/news/oleksandr-zajtsev-vijna-i-vidpovidalnist-istorykiv-zahid-net/
Zernii, Yu. O. (2009). Derzhavna polityka pamiati yak chynnyk utverdzhennia ukrainskoi natsionalnoi identychnosti. [State policy of memory as a factor in establishing Ukrainian national identity.]. (Dys. kand. polit. nauk). Natsionalnyi instytut stratehichnykh doslidzhen, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).